278 ‒ Breast cancer: how to catch, treat, and survive breast cancer | Harold Burstein, M.D., Ph.D.

Guest
Harold Burstein
Read time
~5 min
Uploaded
6 Nov 2023
Duration
2:17:14
Views
221.0K
OPEN ON YOUTUBE ↗

KEYPOINTS

  • 01

    Breast cancer is common, but most women are now cured

    Harold Burstein, a Dana-Farber breast oncologist, gives a US lifetime risk of about 1 in 8 (12–13%). There are roughly 250,000–300,000 invasive cases a year (he first says about 275,000), plus another 50,000–60,000 cases of DCIS, and about 38,000 deaths. Assuming a steady state, about 80–85% of women are cured, while 15–18% remain at risk of recurrence and death. Outcomes depend on both stage and subtype.

  • 02

    Three subtypes drive treatment

    Estrogen-receptor-positive, HER2-negative tumours make up 70–75% or more. They are the type most often found on mammograms, peak around age 65 and, size for size, usually have the best prognosis. Triple-negative cancers (ER, PR and HER2 negative) are about 10–15%, skew younger and are more aggressive. HER2-positive tumours were once very aggressive but now have some of the best treatment results.

  • 03

    Most risk factors move individual risk only a little

    Early first period, late menopause, hormone therapy, fewer pregnancies and less breastfeeding all extend estrogen exposure and may raise risk 25–30%. Burstein says that only moves an individual from about 12% to about 15%. Postmenopausal women with denser breast tissue are at slightly higher risk, and not just because density hides tumours. He calls obesity a relatively weak risk factor, and smoking is not a major one.

  • 04

    DCIS is a precancer, like a colon polyp

    Ductal carcinoma in situ is cells building up inside a duct without invading the surrounding tissue. Seventy years ago it showed up as a lump, but today it is found on mammograms. In about 15–20% of excisions, a small invasive cancer turns up, so the diagnosis is upgraded. In the NSABP B-17 trial, about 25–30% of women treated with lumpectomy alone had a recurrence or new breast cancer within 10 years, and radiation cut that roughly in half. B-24 added tamoxifen. Burstein thinks the baseline risk for today's mammogram-detected DCIS is much lower.

  • 05

    Radiation after DCIS is a trade-off in risk

    For healthy women up to about 65–70, radiation after lumpectomy is standard. It lowers the risk in that breast to something like 1–2% with three to four weeks of treatment. Recurrence risk without radiation ranges from about 5–10% for low-risk lesions to 20–25% for higher-risk ones. Ongoing trials ask which low-risk women can safely skip it.

  • 06

    LCIS signals higher risk rather than being a precursor that must be removed

    Lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical hyperplasia raise the risk of future cancer by roughly 0.5–1% a year and warrant monitoring. In the NSABP P1 prevention trial, which enrolled many women with LCIS, tamoxifen cut breast cancer diagnoses from about 13 to 5–6 per 1,000 women per year. However, it did not improve survival, partly because it prevents the most treatable tumours.

  • 07

    Stage, nodes and biology together predict cure

    Burstein's ballpark 10-year cancer-free survival figures are about 90% or more for stage 1, 75–80% for stage 2 and 65–75% for stage 3. Peter cites 90–95% for tumours of 2 cm or smaller without lymph-node involvement. Risk rises steadily with size, with each additional lymph node, and with tumour grade, Ki-67 and receptor status.

  • 08

    Genomic tests now spare many women chemotherapy

    In 1999 the NCI said essentially every woman with a 1 cm cancer needed chemotherapy. Today, ER-positive tumours are scored with tests such as the Oncotype DX recurrence score or MammaPrint, which show that most low-scoring patients gain little from chemotherapy. Anti-estrogen therapy is advised for nearly all ER-positive patients, longer for high-risk cases, and oral CDK4/6 inhibitors are now added for very high-risk tumours.

  • 09

    Screening plus better drugs each account for about half the mortality decline

    Breast cancer mortality has fallen by about half over 30–40 years. Burstein credits roughly half of that to early detection and half to effective drug therapy, notably trastuzumab (Herceptin) for HER2-positive disease, with data emerging in 2005. Neoadjuvant therapy, meaning drugs before surgery, is increasingly used for larger tumours, and the tumour's response guides prognosis and later treatment.

  • 10

    Hereditary mutations explain only about 8–10% of cases

    BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for about half of hereditary cases, and PALB2, CHEK2 (also linked to colon cancer) and ATM for most of the rest. Clinical panels now test up to about 100 genes. Burstein doesn't rely on consumer tests like 23andMe for clinical decisions. Carriers may consider preventive mastectomy, ovary removal once childbearing is done (there is no good ovarian screening), or intensive screening: an annual MRI and an annual mammogram, staggered six months apart.

EXAMPLES

  • 01

    Peter's case for aggressive screening

    The same chemotherapy can cure early disease after surgery yet rarely cures metastatic disease. So Peter argues that finding cancers earlier, which shifts more of them to stage 1, must cure more women, despite overdiagnosis and lead-time bias. Burstein agrees. He notes that most screening trials ended in the late 1980s, before modern drugs, which partly reduces the advantage of early detection, though smaller tumours still need fewer or less toxic drugs.

  • 02

    Hormone therapy after breast cancer

    Burstein generally avoids systemic hormone replacement for survivors. Instead he uses non-hormonal treatments for osteoporosis and hot flashes (including a recently approved drug) and is fairly liberal with vaginal estrogen, which is absorbed very little into the body. A few women can't function without hormones, and that becomes an individual conversation with them.

  • 03

    Male breast cancer

    There is about 1 male case for every 200 female cases. Nearly all are ER-positive; triple-negative disease is very rare and HER2-positive uncommon, and treatment principles are the same. BRCA mutations in a family also raise men's prostate cancer risk.

  • 04

    Where to get treated

    Burstein says excellent breast cancer care is available at many centres. He thinks variation in care is greatest outside the top institutions, and that multidisciplinary teams combining surgery, radiation and medical oncology are the real test.

OTHER RELEVANT

  • 01

    Get any lump checked

    A palpable lump calls for an evaluation: a diagnostic mammogram, ultrasound and, if needed, a needle biopsy. Ultrasound and MRI supplement mammograms for high-risk or dense breasts but don't replace them.

  • 02

    Know your family history and test for a reason

    A strong history of breast or ovarian cancer warrants clinical genetic testing and counselling for relatives. A positive result changes screening and prevention options.

  • 03

    Ask about genomic scores before agreeing to chemotherapy

    For ER-positive, HER2-negative cancers, a recurrence-score test can show whether chemotherapy adds meaningful benefit.